This is the title of the KEP. Keep it simple and descriptive. A good title can help communicate what the KEP is and should be considered as part of any review.
The filename for the KEP should include the KEP number along with the title.
The title should be lowercased and spaces/punctuation should be replaced with
As the KEP is approved and an official KEP number is allocated, the file should be renamed.
To get started with this template:
1. Pick a hosting SIG.
Make sure that the problem space is something the SIG is interested in taking up.
KEPs should not be checked in without a sponsoring SIG.
1. Allocate a KEP number.
Do this by (a) taking the next number in the
NEXT_KEP_NUMBER file and (b) incrementing that number.
Include the updated
NEXT_KEP_NUMBER file in your PR.
1. Make a copy of this template.
NNNN is the KEP number that was allocated.
1. Fill out the “overview” sections.
This includes the Summary and Motivation sections.
These should be easy if you’ve preflighted the idea of the KEP with the appropriate SIG.
1. Create a PR.
Assign it to folks in the SIG that are sponsoring this process.
1. Merge early.
Avoid getting hung up on specific details and instead aim to get the goal of the KEP merged quickly.
The best way to do this is to just start with the “Overview” sections and fill out details incrementally in follow on PRs.
View anything marked as a
provisional as a working document and subject to change.
Aim for single topic PRs to keep discussions focused.
If you disagree with what is already in a document, open a new PR with suggested changes.
The canonical place for the latest set of instructions (and the likely source of this file) is here.
Metadata section above is intended to support the creation of tooling around the KEP process.
This will be a YAML section that is fenced as a code block.
See the KEP process for details on each of these items.
A table of contents is helpful for quickly jumping to sections of a KEP and for highlighting any additional information provided beyond the standard KEP template. Tools for generating a table of contents from markdown are available.
Summary section is incredibly important for producing high quality user focused documentation such as release notes or a development road map.
It should be possible to collect this information before implementation begins in order to avoid requiring implementors to split their attention between writing release notes and implementing the feature itself.
KEP editors, SIG Docs, and SIG PM should help to ensure that the tone and content of the
Summary section is useful for a wide audience.
A good summary is probably at least a paragraph in length.
This section is for explicitly listing the motivation, goals and non-goals of this KEP. Describe why the change is important and the benefits to users. The motivation section can optionally provide links to experience reports to demonstrate the interest in a KEP within the wider Kubernetes community.
List the specific goals of the KEP. How will we know that this has succeeded?
What is out of scope for his KEP? Listing non-goals helps to focus discussion and make progress.
This is where we get down to the nitty gritty of what the proposal actually is.
Detail the things that people will be able to do if this KEP is implemented. Include as much detail as possible so that people can understand the “how” of the system. The goal here is to make this feel real for users without getting bogged down.
What are the caveats to the implementation? What are some important details that didn’t come across above. Go in to as much detail as necessary here. This might be a good place to talk about core concepts and how they releate.
What are the risks of this proposal and how do we mitigate. Think broadly. For example, consider both security and how this will impact the larger kubernetes ecosystem.
How will we know that this has succeeded?
Gathering user feedback is crucial for building high quality experiences and SIGs have the important responsibility of setting milestones for stability and completeness.
Hopefully the content previously contained in umbrella issues will be tracked in the
Graduation Criteria section.
Major milestones in the life cycle of a KEP should be tracked in
Major milestones might include
Motivationsections being merged signaling SIG acceptance
Proposalsection being merged signaling agreement on a proposed design
Why should this KEP not be implemented.
Similar to the
Drawbacks section the
Alternatives section is used to highlight and record other possible approaches to delivering the value proposed by a KEP.